|
 Justice not served: Cousins Piya (left) and Prithep Sosothikul with a picture of their late grandmother, Boonsom Boonyanit. The Sunday Star
by Roger Tan
The police have to explain their tardiness in
investigating the most infamous land forgery case in Malaysia.
This is a heart-rending story, a story about an incessant quest for justice by
three generations of a Thai family.
It all happened on Dec 12, 1956 when a Thai of Chinese origin, Sie Guan Tjang @
Sie Hang Bok, purchased two pieces of land for investment – Lots 3606 and 3607
of Mukim 18 at Tanjung Bungah, Penang (“the said lands”).
During his lifetime, Sie visited Penang very often with his Thai wife, Boonsom
Boonyanit, also known as Sun Yok Eng. They loved Penang and her people so much
that they had intended to build their retirement home on the said lands. On Jan 18,
1967, the two lots of land were transferred to Boonsom by way of a memorandum of
transfer (“Form 14A”).
Under section 81(3) of the National Land Code (Penang and Malacca Titles) Act
1963 (Act 518), Form 14A was then treated more or less as proof of ownership
over the said lands. Section 92 of Act 518 also provides that pending the
issuance of a final title, an advance certificate of title (“ACT”) would be
issued. Since Jan 18, 1967, Boonsom had been at all times in possession of the
Form 14A apart from faithfully paying all the quit rents and assessments due on
the said lands.
Some time in June 1989, Boonsom’s eldest son, Phiensak Sosothikul, chanced upon
an advertisement in a Thai newspaper, Thairat, dated June 11, 1989, which
was inserted by a law firm from Penang, Messrs Khor, Ong & Co (“KOC”). The
advertisement requested that any person who had any right to the said lands or
any heir to Boonsom residing at a house No. 87, Cantonment Road, Penang,
Malaysia to contact KOC. The court was later told that when Boonsom’s accountant
did contact KOC, the latter could not give any useful information.
Boonsom then engaged the law firm, Messrs Lim Kean Siew & Co (“LKSC”) to conduct
investigations which revealed that the said lands had been fraudulently
transferred by an impostor claiming to be Boonsom to Adorna Properties Sdn Bhd,
then known as Calget Sdn Bhd (“Adorna”) on May 24, 1989.
Boonsom then sued for the return of the said lands. The Penang High Court ruled
in favour of Adorna on April 28, 1995. On appeal, the Court of Appeal in its
judgment dated March 17, 1997 reversed the High Court’s decision. Adorna then
appealed, and the Federal Court comprising Eusoff Chin, Wan Adnan Ismail and Abu
Mansor Ali allowed Adorna’s appeal in its judgment dated Dec 13, 2000 and
pronounced in open court on Dec 22, 2000 (“Adorna Judgment”). Sadly, Boonsom had
already passed away on May 23, 2000.
Boonsom’s second son, Kobchai Sosothikul, being the representative of her
estate, soldiered on and filed two separate motions to the Federal Court for
review of the Adorna Judgment.
In the first attempt, Kobchai argued that when the Adorna Judgment was
delivered, Eusoff Chin had already retired on Dec 19, 2000. Steve Shim, Haidar
bin Mohd Noor and Mokhtar Abdullah dismissed this application in its judgment
dated Feb 26, 2001.
In the second attempt, the Federal Court comprising P.S. Gill, Rahmah Hussein
and Richard Malanjun ruled on Aug 27, 2004 that the Adorna Judgment was not
patently wrong to have resulted in grave injustice.
|